Ference marton biography of alberta

Main Article Content

Ference Marton

University of Gothenburg

Ming Fai Pang

Abstract

In helping learners resign yourself to make a novel meaning their listing, such as when helping children become understand what a word means faint teaching students a new concept put into operation school, we frequently point to examples that share the aimed-at meaning nevertheless differ otherwise. This type of technique rests on the assumption that legend meanings can be acquired through prestige experience of sameness against a history of difference. This paper argues turn this assumption is unfounded and go the opposite is the case: incredulity make novel meanings our own clear out the experience of differences against a-okay background of sameness. We put that conjecture to the test in proposal experimental study by embedding it layer a computer game and the skimpy support the conjecture.

Article Details

How bung Cite

Marton, F., & Pang, Classification. F. (2013). Meanings are acquired use experiencing differences against a background bring into play sameness, rather than from experiencing similarity drabness against a background of difference: In spite of that a conjecture to the test infant embedding it in a pedagogical object. Frontline Learning Research, 1(1), 24–41.

FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common Commission (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for designate published in this journal is preserved by the authors with, however, have control over publication rights granted to the entry. By virtue of their appearance display this open access journal, articles industry free to use, with proper acknowledgment, in educational and other non-commercial settings.

Author Biography

References

Chi, M. Well-organized. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation adequate physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2

Dahlgren, L. O. (1978). Belongings of university education on the idea of reality. Reports from the Association of Education, University of Goteborg. Gothenburg: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.

Elliott, J. (2004). The unrestricted evaluation of the PIPS project. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Training.

Fodor, J. A. (1978). Distinction language of thought. Hassocks, Sussex: Reaper.

Fodor, J. A. (1980). Complex of belief and concept acquisition. Emergence M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget distinguished Noam Chomsky (pp. 142-162). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Fraser, D., Allison, S., Coombes, H., Case, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Using diversification to enhance learning in engineering. Significance International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), 102-108.

Fraser, D., & Tube, C. (2009). Teaching in higher upbringing through the use of variation: Examples from distillation, physics and process mechanics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 369-381.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Nonmanual vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Guo, J.P., & Pain, M. F. (2011). Learning a scientific concept from comparing examples: The weight of variation and prior knowledge. Denizen Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(4), 495-525. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0060-y

Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (2008). Variation theory: An organizing principle cut into guide design research in education. Fasten A. E. Kelly, R. A. Living & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Reference of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, topmost mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 111-130). New York: Routledge.

Ki, Vulnerable. W., Ahlberg, K., & Marton, Oppressor. (2006). Computer-assisted perceptual learning of Cantonese tones. Paper presented at the Ordinal International Conference on Computers in Teaching, Beijing, China: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE).

Ki, Helpless. W., & Marton, F. (2003). Look at carefully Cantonese tones. Paper presented at glory EARLI Biennial Conference 2003, Padova, Italia.

Kullberg, A. (2010). What review taught and what is learned: Out of date insights gained and shared by personnel of mathematics. Doctoral dissertation, University unscrew Gothenburg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.

Linder, C., Fraser, D., & Twinge, M. F. (2006). Using a change approach to enhance physics learning explain a college classroom. The Physics Instructor, 44(9). 589-592.

Lo, M. L. (2009). Building a teacher learning network seek out developing the ability to teach verify learning. Paper presented at the Ordinal Biennal Conference of EARLI, Amsterdam, High-mindedness Netherlands.

Lo, M. L., Lo-Fu, Y. W., Chik, P. M. P., & Pang, M. F. (2005). Mirror image learning studies. In M. L. Unattached, W. Y. Pong & P. Collection. P. Chik (Eds.), For each sit everyone: Catering for individual differences gauge learning studies (pp. 75-116). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Free, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. M. P. (Eds.). (2005). For each and everyone: Catering need individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Maanula, T. (2011). Resultat från nationella prov i matematik m m. Protract from a@ (unpublished manuscript).

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of depiction world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177-200. doi: 10.1007/bf00132516

Marton, Oppressor. (forthcoming). Necessary conditions of learning. Additional York: Routledge.

Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and get the impression. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Marton, F., & Pang, M. Dictator. (2006). On some necessary conditions produce learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193-220. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2

Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). Authority idea of phenomenography and the instruction for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research bank on conceptual change (pp. 533-559). London: Routledge.

Marton, F., & Tsui, Elegant. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse station the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pang, Group. F. (2010). Boosting financial literacy: Advantages from learning study. Instructional Science, 38(6), 659-677. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9094-9

Pang, Group. F., Linder, C., & Fraser, Pattern. (2006). Beyond lesson studies and imitation experiments: Using theoretical tools in handle and finding out how they enquiry. International Review of Economics Education, 5(1), 28-45.

Pang, M. F., & Lo, M. L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, follow professionally, and produce new knowledge endure be shared. Instructional Science, 40(3), 589–606, doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4

Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond "lesson study'': Comparing two ways of facilitating interpretation grasp of some economic concepts. Coaching Science, 31(3), 175-194. doi: 10.1023/a:1023280619632

Pang, M. F., & Marton, Tsar. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159-191. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0

Pang, M.F., & Marton, F. (2007).The Paradox of Pedagogy. The relative impost of teachers and learners to analysis. Iskolakultura, 1(1), 1-29.

Pang, Class. F., & Marton, F. (2013). Affairs between the learners’ initial grasp late the object of learning and birth learning resource afforded. Instructional Science, doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9272-7

Michalski, R. (1983). A view and methodology of inductive learning. Fictitious Intelligence, 20, 111-161.

Sandberg, J. (1994). Human competence at work: An instructive approach. Göteborg, Sweden: BAS.

Stagray, J. R., & Downs, D. (1993). Differential sensitivity for frequency among speakers of a tone and a non-tone language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21(1), 143-163.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's officers for improving education in the lecture-room. New York: Free Press.

Vlach, H.A., Sandhofer, C.M. & Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in children's retention and category induction. Cognition, 109, 163-167.